Weatherford Democrat

Local News

October 25, 2007

Council decides to get rid of parking meters

Galen Scott

gscott@weatherforddemocrat.com

Uncertainty about the wishes of Downtown Weatherford merchants regarding parking enforcement was erased Tuesday, as Assistant City Manager Jerry Blaisdell announced survey results heavily favoring the removal of some 200 historic parking meters around the Square.

Blaisdell said 64 percent of the 56 business owners and representatives surveyed indicated parking regulation is not important to their business at all.

“When asked which form of parking enforcement would best serve their business — parking meters, 2-hour parking, 1-hour limited parking, 30-minute limited parking or no restrictions — 59 percent responded they prefer no restrictions,” he added.

The parking meter issue was raised during a council work session two weeks ago when Mayor Joe Tison reminded council members that removing the meters is part of the Downtown revitalization plan. He noted the transportation code should be amended in order to reflect the meters’ absence.

However, additional merchant input was requested after Council members Waymon Hamilton and Clem Smith expressed concerns about what effect removing the meters might have on commerce. In addition, some on the council had said they couldn’t recall voting specifically on whether or not the meters should be removed.

Research conducted by Blaisdell and other city staffers, including Assisstant to the City Manager Danielle Felts, suggests the city council agreed to get rid of the parking meters in 2001, but decided to wait until the planned revitalization project commenced.

“A survey conducted in 2001 indicated a vast majority of the business owners at that time did not want parking meters,” Blaisdell reported.

Council members approved axing the meters a second time, albeit imprecisely, when the final version of the revitalization plan, which does call for the meters’ removal, was ratified in 2004, according to Blaisdell’s report.

Blaisdell said only two of 56 people who participated in the most recent survey specified they would like to see the meters remain. He went on to say it would cost approximately $26,000 to refurbish the existing meters, many of which are non-functional, and about $60,000 to purchase new, digital meters.

“After reviewing this, the staff still takes the same position it was taking,” Blaisdell said during Tuesday’s work session. “We would recommend that the formal report presented on Oct. 9 be represented, and the staff recommends removal of the meters ...”

The original staff report included a recommendation to sell broken meters to the public for $50, and functional units for $75.

There was no additional discussion of the matter during the council’s regular meeting, which followed Tuesday’s work session.

Waymon Hamilton’s motion to amend the city transportation code to reflect the meters’ absence was seconded by Councilwoman Jan Barton and the council voted in unison.

Text Only
Local News
Top News
House Ads
AP Video
Beryl Makes Landfall on Florida Coast UN Blames Syrian Forces for Shelling Houla Raw Video: Gay Protest Blocked in Moscow Vatican in Chaos After Butler Arrested for Leaks Jimmy Carter Endorses Egypt's Election Results Biden Addresses West Point Graduating Class Dozens of Children Killed in New Syria Attack Raw Video: Activists Allege Massacre in Syria NJ Man Charged With Murder in Death of Patz Support, Fun for Kids of Fallen Soldiers at Camp Fugitive Penguin Caught, Returned to Aquarium 50 Years Later, Underground Fire Still Burning Light Show Transforms Sydney Opera House Raw Video: Unruly Passenger Restrained in Miami Raw Video: Robber Uses Drive-thru Window Raw Video: Dragon Arrives at Space Station Calif.'s Coronado Named Nation's Best Beach CEO Salaries Become Sore Issue in Labor Disputes
Community Calendar
Loading…
Events by eviesays.com
Poll

The Air Force Academy recently graduated their first openly gay cadets. What does this signify?

Nothing. There have always been gay cadets, they just haven't been open.
A step backward. Sexual orientation issues shouldn't be a part of the military.
A step forward. The military needs to be open to people of all backgrounds.
No opinion.
     View Results