Weatherford Democrat

Viewpoints

February 7, 2010

High-dollar ads for the big game

WEATHERFORD — Phil Riddle

editor@weatherforddemocrat.com

I love the Super Bowl.

I’m a football fan, so the game is the finishing touch to a five-month campaign for a title in the NFL.

More than that, though, I enjoy the spectacle.

The entire broadcast is viewed by nearly a billion people across the globe, driving costs for advertising on the world’s biggest stage into the economic stratosphere.

According to CBS, host of SB XLIV, some ads this year, based on their placement throughout the game, cost companies in excess of $3 million for 30 seconds of air time.

That’s never really bothered me. It’s capitalism at work.

It never concerned me that a beer company or a car company was writing a check with that many zeros on it to have its products viewed during the latest Roman Numeral Bowl.

Until I started getting to help pay the bill.

Yep. Our friends and benefactors in Washington have decided their combined constituencies are going to spring for a $2.5 million ad touting the importance of the 2010 census.

The census, conducted every 10 years, is an official head count of the nation, mandated by the Constitution, to help fairly distribute taxpayer money and decide representation.

Between touchdown passes, sacks, fumbles and former jocks spouting superlatives about this year’s game will be a taxpayer-funded, 30-second spot reminding us to fill out the form so we get the representation we deserve.

If our best interest were being represented, we wouldn’t be hit up to pay for a TV ad while rotating a diet of rice and beans and beans and rice while keeping our fingers crossed our jobs don’t get outsourced to India.

Help me with this, please.

As a country we are facing deficits that will financially cripple us for generations even if we stop spending now. We are in the throes of uncertain economic times when folks are losing their jobs and houses at a pace not seen since the Great Depression. And the Gucci-shoe crowd on the Potomac signed a purchase order to spend $2,500,000 so we get counted.

And that ain’t all.

According to broadcast reports, the Census bureau is spending $133 million between January and May to publicize the count. Let’s see, they’ve already told us there are only 10 questions ... if a train leaves Washington at 6 p.m. going 65 mph ... carry the one ... that’s 13 million bucks PER QUESTION.

Our duly elected representatives are charging US $13 million to ask our address, our phone number and how many bathrooms we have in our house. Why can’t they just check our tax returns. All our contact information is there and the bureaucrats are very efficient at gathering those each April without spending $133 million on advertising.

I was planning a Super Bowl Party today with brats and chili, nachos, chips, dips, pies, cakes and lots of fun with friends in front of a big screen.

I may have to tone down the celebration.

After all, I’m on the hook for part of a $2.5 million advertising bill.

Text Only
Viewpoints
Top News
House Ads
AP Video
Beryl Makes Landfall on Florida Coast Service Dogs Help Wash. Soldiers Battling PTSD Raw Video: Heckler Bursts in on Blair Testimony Japan Farmers Plant, Seek Radiation-free Rice UN Blames Syrian Forces for Shelling Houla Raw Video: Gay Protest Blocked in Moscow Vatican in Chaos After Butler Arrested for Leaks Jimmy Carter Endorses Egypt's Election Results Biden Addresses West Point Graduating Class Dozens of Children Killed in New Syria Attack Raw Video: Activists Allege Massacre in Syria NJ Man Charged With Murder in Death of Patz Support, Fun for Kids of Fallen Soldiers at Camp Fugitive Penguin Caught, Returned to Aquarium 50 Years Later, Underground Fire Still Burning Light Show Transforms Sydney Opera House Raw Video: Unruly Passenger Restrained in Miami Raw Video: Robber Uses Drive-thru Window Raw Video: Dragon Arrives at Space Station Calif.'s Coronado Named Nation's Best Beach
Community Calendar
Loading…
Events by eviesays.com
Poll

The Air Force Academy recently graduated their first openly gay cadets. What does this signify?

Nothing. There have always been gay cadets, they just haven't been open.
A step backward. Sexual orientation issues shouldn't be a part of the military.
A step forward. The military needs to be open to people of all backgrounds.
No opinion.
     View Results